"I have hated the words and I have loved them, and hope I have been on a par with them"

Liesel Meminger>

[The Book Thief, Markus Zusak]

domingo, 6 de marzo de 2011

How do students learn?* [Essay]

When we talk about learning process we must have in mind different aspects, like the age of the students,  their interests, their reasons to study, the subject we teachers are trying to teach, and of course,  the motivation that our students have.
Learning is a wide field in education, because it has a lot of aspects, actors and characteristics that related each other can improve or make worse the education. Learning has also a lot of troubles and a lot of people trying to find an effective solution for each one of them. One of those troubles is that in the different levels of education, children, teenagers and even adults do not want to learn anymore and seem to care about nothing that happens around them.
Because of that, the present essay aspires to answer the following question: How do students learn? First by exposing the trouble about the students that nowadays are not interested in acquire knowledge; second by explaining some important aspects about some  learning theories; and third by presenting a personal point of view about how education should be and also making some suggestions.
By way of introduction, let me start by saying that the present essay is focused in the learning of a second language (English) in the High Schools of Mexico.  The learning of any subject, but in this case of a second language (English) requires interest, disposition and motivation by those who are interested in learn it, but also requires to take advantage as much as we can of the age of students, because it will be easier for them if they start the acquisition of a second language at an early age.
 Krashen´s theory talks about the existence of "different periods for acquire a second language. He says that it is easier to a child to acquire a foreign language since his birth until the age of 13 to 15 years, after this period, people will have more troubles for speak and develop a foreign language(Schütz, 2007, S.K)".
But in Mexico we have a serious problem, we do not take advantage of the age of the children , because the teaching of English begins at age of 11 or 12 year old, when students are about to finish their rank of age for learning in an easy way a foreign language, so we are wasting all the childhood of our students.
On the other hand, we have a second trouble, when students start the study of English they are teenagers, and they are crossing for a phase in their lives in which they don´t know who they are or what they want, so they have personal identity issues and they are not interested in acquiring any kind of knowledge, including English.
So, when we have these important troubles, what we teachers must do for our students learn?
I consider  that the communicative approach for the teaching of a foreign language is pretty good, because it reflects the real interest of students when they are learning a second language, this real interest is communication, when someone is learning English he or she wants to communicate, wants to be understood and wants to be able to understand the other person who is talking to, so grammar rules get less important when the main function of knowing a second language is communication.
By other side, "knowledge is built when persons interact each other" (Meece, 2002, p.35)this means that any kind of knowledge will be easily acquired when people are talking to each other, when they are exchanging ideas, because when students work inside a team, they will help each other and they will correct their own mistakes.
But also it is very important that students reflect about their own knowledge, that they find their own problems and figure out how to solve them, that they become the main subjects of their learning process, by making their own analysis, reflections and conclusions
So, what I mean with this three aspects is that for a student learn English it is necessary in first place that they find it useful for they can communicate with other persons, so if they follow this way, they will practice and will improve their language; in second place, it is important that they get  in touch with other students who have the same interests, purposes and objectives, for they can work together in order to help each other; and in third place, it is important that the teacher does not give them the way in which language works, but they should discover it by themselves by reflecting, analyzing, and finding the resolution to their own troubles.
However there is another important element in the process of learning a foreign language. This is motivation, and most of this motivation should be promoted by teachers, because we should find the way to encourage our students to learn, we must elaborate strategies in order to they get involved with the topic, and they feel motivated to learn, because without motivation, students will not care about learning.
So, as we see, most of the work of student´s learning is responsibility of the teacher, because he or she must create all the necessary conditions for  students learn, it is not just about exposing a topic to them, it is about encouraging them to reflection and use of language, to practice and interaction with their classmates.
However, despite all the elements before are necessary for students to learn, at the end of the day I can say that  for achieve a real learning of the students we must make deeper changes in the Mexican system of education, because all the good ideas and theories that must be applied can be really useful if they  are applied in the right way, the Mexican system of education is not just about proposals of excellent methods and theories, it is about a total transformation in the system, for create the best conditions  in order to apply it, so, it is true that we teachers have a great responsibility to prepare good classes for students can really learn, but we need the cooperation and coordination of the entire Mexican system of education.











Essay*

Level of knowledge of the students*

Mexican English studies program for basic education establish that at the end of basic education students must reach A2 Waystage Level (180-200 study hours) according to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. This means that at the end of secondary school students:
“Can understand sentences and frequently used expressions related to areas of most immediate relevance (e.g. very basic personal and family information, shopping, local geography, employment). Can communicate simple and routine tasks requiring a simple and direct exchange of information on familiar and routine matters. Can describe simple terms aspects of his /her background, immediate environment and matters in areas of immediate needs.”
According to the level of English that the student is supposed to achieve, I focused my research on the study of the second grade at Técnica No. 43 Secondary School.
Let me start by explaining the objectives and knowledge students must reach at the end of First Grade.
The purposes of First Grade are:
XTo acquire basic vocabulary and fixed expressions in order to communicate in English in the foreign language classroom.
½ Become familiar with a variety of oral and written texts (quotidian, academic and literary) and use them for limited purposes.
1/2Acquire confidence in using a limited range of structures and vocabulary.
XDevelop and rely on some basic strategies in order to compensate for a lack of the language.

* X means a ability that has not been developed. ½ means and ability that has been developed in a medium level.
According to my research, students had not acquired basic classroom vocabulary. I could notice this because when they asked me for basic permissions or they wanted to talk to me about something of the class (such as asking permission to go to the bathroom, asking for help, asking questions, asking to repeat instructions, etc.) they talked to me in Spanish.
Also I noticed that they had not developed strategies in order to compensate their lack of knowledge of the language, because when they were producing their own texts and they didn´t know how to express a sentence or a word they asked me for help.
However I could notice they became familiar with written texts and they probably were comfortable with them, because their attitude showed they knew what they were doing and how to do it. But they were not familiar with oral texts, they seemed to be embarrassed about them and they seem to do not know what to do.
For my research I asked my students first to create their dream house, then they should make a composition describing it, my objective was that they used the new vocabulary of the class, but I did not limit them to the new words. I asked to describe their dream house, so they must have used another kind of vocabulary they know in order to make a clear and complete description.
The vocabulary and grammatical structures I wanted them to use were:
  •  
  • Furniture Vocabulary
  •  There is/ There are
  • Prepositions of place
But they could also make use of another kind of knowledge, such as:
Structures students used
Structures students did not used in a correct way
And
Colors
a/an
Prepositions of place

Verbs in third person (s)

A/an

But


The structures I expected them to use were structures they had knowledge of, because they must have learned about them in first grade, but most of them were not applied by the students.
Although I was supposed to teach my students Prepositions of place, this is a topic they should already know, because this is of first grade. However I could notice most of them did not remember it at all.
Some of them used very well the article “a” and the article “an”. Most of them did not include colors in their description. Some of them used verbs without “s” when they were talking in third person. Any of them used “but” in their description.
At the end of the day is very clear that we teachers need to improve the integrative knowledge, this means we should to integrate previous knowledge in every class, because if we do not do this, students are not able to apply everything they know. So if we teachers do not achieve our students can communicate effectively, we are not following the communicative approach and everything we teach them becomes “Forgotten Knowledge” (Perkins, 2003).
Information Sources
David Perkins, Smart Schools. From training memories to educated minds. Barcelona. 2003. Gedisa Ed
 Educación Básica. Secundaria Programas de Estudio 2006. SEP. 2006





Images of the House descriptions

Research*

Second Semester OPD*

Second Semester OPD*